🗳️ Kenya 2022 Election Results by County — Full IEBC Bomas of Kenya Tally (All 47 Counties)
Kenya 2022 Election Results – All 47 Counties | IEBC Bomas of Kenya Tally | Form 34A & 34B Verification
🇰🇪 Kenya 2022 Election Results
🕐 Loading…
📅 Loading…
All 47 Counties — Official IEBC Bomas of Kenya Tally
Presidential, Governor, and Senator results with registered voters, polling stations, and spoilt votes — plus the Form 34A / Form 34B integrity record and the Supreme Court ruling.
Registered Voters
22,120,458
IEBC 2022 register
Total Votes Cast
14,213,027
Presidential
Ruto (UDA)
7,176,141
50.49%
Odinga (Azimio)
6,942,930
48.85%
Spoilt Votes
113,614
Presidential
⚠️
Data Completeness Notice
Presidential totals below are drawn from the IEBC Bomas of Kenya national tally and published Forms 34B / 34C.
Where a figure is shown as “—”, the verified value was not available in this dataset and has been left blank rather than estimated.
Governor and Senator candidate-level vote numbers are shown where officially collated; many entries are recorded by winner and party only.
For the definitive record, always consult the original Forms on
forms.iebc.or.ke.
⚖️ Election Integrity & Verification: The Form 34A / 34B Dispute
The 2022 presidential election result was challenged at the Supreme Court of Kenya, primarily over alleged
discrepancies between polling-station results (Form 34A) and constituency tallies (Form 34B). Below is the
result-form hierarchy, the specific allegations raised, and the court’s final ruling.
📋 The Result Forms Explained
Form 34A
Polling Station Level
The primary record of presidential votes. Completed and signed at each polling station by the
Presiding Officer and candidates’ agents, then transmitted electronically to the National Tallying Centre.
46,229 polling stations in 2022
Signed by agents before transmission
Uploaded to the public IEBC portal
Legal bedrock for verification
Form 34B
Constituency Level
A collation of all Form 34As within a constituency, prepared by the Constituency Returning Officer.
These 290 forms were used by the IEBC Chairperson at Bomas of Kenya to announce the final result.
290 constituencies nationwide
Prepared by Constituency Returning Officer
Basis of the national declaration
Central to the 2022 petition
Form 34C
National Level
The final national tally, generated from all 290 Forms 34B. This is the document used by the IEBC
Chairperson to officially declare the winner of the presidential election.
Single national collation document
Signed by the IEBC Chairperson
Instrument of final declaration
Subject of the 2022 declaration
🔍 The Azimio Allegations
▼
Vote Discrepancies: Azimio lawyers alleged a difference of approximately
180,000 votes between the totals recorded in Forms 34A, 34B, and 34C.
Specific Errors: Claims of a polling station in Kiambu County where Raila Odinga’s
votes were recorded as 11 instead of 111, and where William Ruto was allegedly
erroneously awarded 10,000 votes.
Omitted Results: The petition claimed that results from 27 constituencies
had not been announced or included in the final tally.
Portal Tampering: Allegations that the IEBC continued to upload and delete forms
from its public portal even after the declaration had been made.
Form 34A as Primary Record: Azimio argued that the polling-station Form 34A was the
authoritative record and should have been used to verify and, where necessary, correct Form 34B.
Core Argument: That the IEBC Chairperson’s declaration did not reflect the true
aggregation of polling-station results, and that the discrepancies were material to the outcome.
🏛️ The Supreme Court Ruling
▼
Legal Basis: The Court ruled that the IEBC Chairperson’s declaration, based
exclusively on Form 34B, was legally sound.
On the Maina Kiai Principle: The Court held that its earlier decision did not
relieve the IEBC of its duty to verify results, but it also did not force the IEBC to use Form 34A
in preference to Form 34B for the final declaration.
No Correction Power: Crucially, the Court ruled that the IEBC cannot correct
errors in Forms 34B even where they differ from Forms 34A. It is the IEBC’s duty to
“expose such discrepancies” and leave their resolution to the election court.
Standard of Proof: The petitioners were required to prove that the alleged
irregularities were of such a nature and magnitude as to affect the result. The Court found this
threshold was not met.
Outcome: The Supreme Court unanimously upheld William Ruto’s win,
validating the results as declared from the Forms 34B.
Final Determination: The declaration based on Form 34B stands. Discrepancies between
Forms 34A and 34B, where they exist, do not of themselves invalidate the national declaration — they must
be proven to be material and to affect the outcome.
No comments:
Post a Comment